<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN">
<title>Compositing and Blending Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2014-01-07 LCWD</title>
<style type="text/css">
  .a  { background: lightgreen }
  .d  { background: lightblue  }
  .r  { background: orange     }
  .fo { background: red        }
  .open   { border: solid red; padding: 0.2em; }
  :target { box-shadow: 0.25em 0.25em 0.25em;  }
</style>

<h1>Compositing and Blending Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2014-01-07 LCWD</h1>

<p>Last call document: <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-compositing-1-20140107/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-compositing-1-20140107/</a>

<p>Editor's draft: <a href="http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/compositing-1/">http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/compositing-1</a>

<p>The following color coding convention is used for comments:</p>

<ul>
 <li class="a">Accepted or Rejected and positive response
 <li class="r">Rejected and no response
 <li class="fo">Rejected and negative response
 <li class="d">Deferred
 <li class="oi">Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified
</ul>

<p class=open>Open issues are marked like this</p>

<p>An issue can be closed as <code>Accepted</code>, <code>OutOfScope</code>,
<code>Invalid</code>, <code>Rejected</code>, or <code>Retracted</code>.
<code>Verified</code> indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.</p>
<pre class='a' id='issue-1'>
Issue 1. <a href="#issue-1">#</a>
Summary:  references cleanup
From:     Erik Dahlstrom
Comment:  <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2014JanMar/0031.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2014JanMar/0031.html</a>
Response: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2014JanMar/0040.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2014JanMar/0040.html</a>
Closed:   Accepted
</pre>
<pre class='' id='issue-http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2014JanMar/0040.html'>


</pre>
